Questions & Answers 14

Is it permissible for a woman in menses to recite more than seven verses from the Holy Qur’an (other than the verses that require obligatory prostration)? If it is permissible, is it disliked (makrûh)? And does that mean that she will be rewarded for reciting, albeit less [than normal]? Question:
She is allowed to recite other than the verses that require obligatory prostration; and when it is said, “it is disliked to recite more than seven verses,” this means that the reward of such recitation will be less. Answer:
A father asks the friend of his son to monitor his behaviour in order to know his son’s character. Is the friend allowed to disclose any information regerding the character of the son to the father that might include things that the son does not want to be known to anyone? Question:
It is not allowed, except when he is involved in an evil act from which he must be stopped and that stopping him is not possible through anything other than disclosure of his behaviour (which would embarrass and hurt him). Answer:
What is the meaning of the statement from the had?th that “the first glance is [permissible] for you, but the second one will [be held] against you”? Is it permissible to prolong the first glance while looking at a woman on the basis, as claimed by some, that it is still “the first permissible glance”? Question:
Apparently the meaning of the statement mentioned above is to differentiate between the two glances in the sense that the first was just an accidental and a passing one, and so it is considered guiltless since no lustful desires were involved in it, as opposed to the second glance which was naturally intentional and accompanied with an element of desire, and therefore is detrimental. It is because of this that a statement has been quoted by Imam as-Sadiq (a.s.) in which he says, “The glance after the [first] one creates in the heart the desire and that is sufficient as a temptation for the person.” It is, however, clear that the statement quoted in the question does not intend to define the permissible glance on the basis of numbers, in the sense that the first glance is permissible, even if it is intentional and guileful from the very beginning. Or that it becomes such, if it is prolonged and more persistant because the on-looker cannot control it by casting his glance away from the woman that he is looking at. Nor does it mean that the second glance is forbidden, even if it is for a single moment without any lust at all. Answer:
While discussing the issue of looking at a woman, many expressions are used that are not clearly defined for most people. So, what is the meaning of “ar-rayba, at-taladh-dhudh, and ash-shahwa”? Question:
At-Taladh-dhudh and ash-shahwa mean lustful and sexual desire, not just any lust or any desire that is part of the human instinct that appears when one sees beautiful scenes. Ar-rayba means the fear of temptation or the falling into haram. Answer:
What is the limit of forbidden lust? Question:
Its minimum limit —if what is meant is the ranking order— i.e. it is the first stage of sexual arousal. Answer:
In British government schools and also in other Western countries the students, male as well as females, are taught sex education which includes detailed description of sexual organs with or without model. Is it permissible for a young student to attend classes like this? Is it necessary for the parents to prevent the young child from attending such classes when the child expresses interest in by claiming that it will be useful for him in the future? Question:
If attending such classes does not entail other haram deeds like looking lustfully and, as a result of studying that unit, would result preventy him from deviant behaviour, then there is no problem in it. Answer:
Is it permissible to recite erotic poems in presence of women without intending to woo them, or with such an intention, if they are unmarried and can be influenced by such recitation? Question:
This is not allowed. Answer:
Is it permissible to talk to women about love without lustful intention or fear of temptation or encouraging a haram act? Question:
Based on obligatory precaution, it is not allowed. Answer:
Is it permissible to praise in erotic poetry, or in prose, a unspecified woman or women in general? Question:
If it is devoid of intent to commit haram or similar acts and entails no other harm [in moral and ethical sense], then there is no problem in it. Answer:
Is it permissible to talk with women without lustful intention for the purpose of gaining satisfaction with one of them and then to propose temporary marriage to her? Question:
If the talk is devoid of what one should be talking about to a strange [i.e., non-mahram] woman, then there is no problem in it. Answer:
A new craze has spread in Europe in which men wear ladies’ earrings in one or both ears. Is this allowed for them? Question:
It is not permissible if it is made of gold; rather not at all, based on obligatory precaution. Answer:
If a person commits haram by shaving his beard by razor baled on day one, is it permissible for him to do the same on the second, the third, the fourth day and so on? Question:
It is precautionarily compulsory to refrain from it. Answer:
At times the big companies in Europe discriminate —among those who come to them seeking jobs— between those who shave the irbeards and those who don’t shave them. If this is true, then is it permissible to be clean shaven in order to get the job? Question:
Shaving the beard —whose prohibition is based on obligatory precaution— would not become permissible just by the desire to get a job with these companies. Answer:
Is it permissible to shave the two sides of the face and leave the hair on the chin?s Question:
Shaving the beard is haram based on obligatory precaution, and this includes the hair that grows on the sides of the face. However, there is no problem in shaving the hair that grows on the cheeks. Answer:
Is it permissible to play games of chance of all kinds on electronic machines (computers) without betting or with betting? Question:
It is not permissible, and it is treated the same as normal [non-electronic] gambling instruments. Answer:
Some permissible games use dice in them. So is it allowed to play with it? Question:
If the dice is not from the tools that are exclusively for gambling, then there is no problem in using it in non-gambling games. Answer:
Is it permissible to look at what the non-Muslim women normally expose of their body during the summer season? Question:
If the glance does not entail lustful desire or temptation [to commit sins], then there is no problem in it. Answer:
Is it permissible to look at the picture of a well-known muhajjaba woman who appears without hijab in that picture? [Muhajjaba means a lady who observes hijab.] Question:
Based on obligatory precaution, one must refrain from looking at other than the face and the hands of that woman; even in the case of these two, it is permissible without lustful intent and temptation [for sin]. Answer:
(a) Is it permissible to look at non-Muslim women who are naked or half-naked in television and its like for the purpose of fulfilling the inquisitive nature with no guarantee whether or not sexual desire will be aroused? (b) Is it permissible to look at them in the streets not for the purpose mentioned above but for arousing [the sexual desire of] the husband towards his wife? Question:
It is not permissible to look with lust at the naked live scenes, on television, etc. Rather, based on compulsory precaution, one must refrain from it at all times. Answer:
Is it permissible to look at arousing scenes if one is sure of not attaining arousal? Question:
If it is a naked [indecent] scene, then based on obligatory precaution, one should refrain from looking at it. Answer: